Germany: the Green Party and its murky past. A “Human Rights expert” promoting paedophilia.

By J.C. von Krempach, J.D. | May 27, 2013

While Daniel Cohn-Bendit, the front man of the Green Party in the European Parliament, has announced that he will not run for re-election in 2014, it is becoming increasingly clear that he was not the only one in his party to have advocated the legalization of paedophilia. Indeed, the influence of paedophile networks on the party’s political programme was far greater than is generally known, as a recent report by the German weekly “Der Spiegel” has revealed.

Daniel Cohn-Bendit

It should be noted in this regard that homosexuals and self-declared paedophiles joined in a caucus called “Schwup” (=Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft Schwule, Päderasten und Transsexuelle, i.e. the Federal Working Party of Gays, Pederasts and Trassexuals), which was financed by the Green Party.

On 10 March 1985 the Greens of North-Rhine Westphalia (the largest of Germany’s federal entities) decided to include into their electoral program a paper in which they requested that “all forms of non-violent sexual intercourse, including between adults and children, should be legal”. In that same paper, “non-violent sex between adults and children” (one is tempted to wonder: does “non-violent” mean “consensual”???) is described as “pleasurable for both sides, productive, conducive to development, in short: positive”.

According to Mr. Cohn-Bendit, this was not merely an opinion of a minority within the Party. “Just look at the various position papers regarding the age of consent. This was a mainstream position”, he said.

Later on, the issue was silently dropped – probably not out of conviction, but because the Party discovered that public morality had not yet eroded to such a degree as to make this part of their program seem acceptable. Instead, the Party focussed on the promotion of homosexuality and transsexualism, pretending that this was not part of one and the same agenda to subvert public morality.

Indeed, the linkage seems quite logical. Promoting homosexuality and transsexualism means to sever the link between sexuality and procreation, and to proclaim the enjoyment of physical pleasure as the sole purpose of sexuality. But if that view is accepted, it seems perfectly logical to accept “non-violent sex with children” as a legitimate form of sexuality. Which is exactly what the 1985 Paper says.

For a long time, the Greens have downplayed or even flatly denied their past involvement in the promotion of paedophilia. But in the wake of the scandal concerning Daniel Cohn-Bendit, they now want to make a PR effort to purify their image. For that purpose, they have announced that independent researchers will get access to their archives in order to find out the exact background of the Party’s controversial paedophile agenda.

Will that really be sufficient? As we have noted before, the problem is neither Mr. Cohn-Bendit (who very likely is not himself paedophile) nor the Party’s past, but the present: its consistent involvement in the promotion of unnatural sexual behaviours as part of its political agenda – not thirty years ago, but today! Thus, the Greens will not be credible on paedophilia if they do not re-think their current positions.

Volker Beck, a "human rights" expert with unusual ideas

[And of course it will be necessary for some prominent politicians to step down. One particularly conspicuous example is Mr. Volker Beck, a Member of the German Bundestag, who is also the Green Party’s long-standing “Human Rights expert” (his main qualification for the job being that he is himself homosexual and thus takes a keen personal interest in “LGBT(P) equality”).

Back in 1998 Mr. Beck wrote a contribution for a book with the title “Der pädosexuelle Komplex” (= The Paedosexual Complex), in which he made the following statement:

“The De-criminalization of paedo-sexuality is … urgently necessary, given that maintaining the existing criminal provisions against it stands in contradiction to fundamental principles oft he rule of law.”

Indeed, this is what one would expect a “human rights expert” to write on paedophilia, isn’t it?

Mr. Beck today says that his manuscript had been manipulated by the editors against his will and knowledge. However, there are no traces of any subsequent efforts on his side to rectify his alleged statements, or to distance himself from them. Which does not make his apologies seem very credible.

Thus it appears that the promotion of paedophilia, albeit having been dropped from the Party’s official program, is still part of the Green’s hidden agenda. The continued presence of a politician like Mr. Volker Beck as the Party’s spokesperson on “Human Rights” proves it: the link between “LGBT issues” and the promotion of paedophilia is a very close one.

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter